BRITAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wow... Just figured out... Let's follow step by step...

1. Britain's past is totally vague. Most agree it's not Indoeuropean.
2. But we know for sure it was not Indoeuropean for Siluri, Culcheth, Lyvpool, overo, Cymru and more. All that has been mentioned in this blog. Note that the key Kartvelian place in Britain seems to be Wales.
3. Wales' ancient name was Brytenlond:
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Britain
4. 'Britain' is thought to originate from 'Prydain':
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britain_(placename)#Etymology
5. The upsilon-problem has been addressed many times. 'Y' is [u], not [i].

So, if we want a TRUE 'Britain' etymology, we should look for PRUT-root within Kartvelian vocabulary.

It is not only perfectly exists in Rayfield's dictionary. It exists there in the following meaning:

ფრუტი [pruti] - 'misty dizzling'! (archaic word)

So, when Pytheas told about PRITANI, in fact he meant PRYTANI, which is adjective derived from P(H)RUTI.

So, Britain was depicted by Pytheas (or those, who told him the name) as 'misty and dizzling'!

Could there be any better definition of Britain?