I'm criticized for finding the phonological similarities. It's not true. What I'm finding are not phonological, but morphemical, and not similarities, but identities. In most cases I'm simply pointing at the fact that a word from the very beginning looked totally Kartvelian, but was crooked into something IE-looking.
For example, the recently mentioned TAUROI [tauri]. We should have been reading it from the very beginning as [ta-oo-ri]. That's the only true reading of this Greek word, and it's Kartvelian. While it's the generally accepted reading of [ta-v-ri] that should make the brows raise. Why on earth TAVRI, when it's TAURI? Why on earth LIBIA when it's LUBIA?
No comments:
Post a Comment